The Boston Phoenix (via Susan Crawford): "Podcasting...could
evolve into the most
serious challenge to commercial radio since television. Radio’s descent
into bottom-line-oriented irrelevance, sped by the 1996 repeal of any
meaningful controls on corporate ownership, has been well-documented.
Other than public radio, which is thriving, the best-known alternative
to the commercial AM and FM bands is satellite radio, which got a big
boost in visibility in 2004 thanks to former NPR host Bob Edwards’s
move to the XM network and Howard Stern’s $500 million deal with
Sirius. But satellite requires a new radio receiver and costs around
$10 a month. Podcasting, by contrast, is free...."
At the ellipsis, I excised the words "could be a passing fad — or it" because I didn't think "passing fad"
was a realistic alternative. In my mind, it was sort of like saying
that the Internet or RSS "could be a passing fad." For example, even in
my own amateur way, I think I've added something valuable to radio.
Today's podcast played all of the songs nominated for Grammy awards in
Grammy Category 40 ("Best Country Instrumental Performance: solo, duo,
group or collaborative performances, without vocals"). These songs are never played
on commercial radio, but they deserve to be. They are terrific. In
preparing for today's podcast I realized just how much I've been
missing in commercial radio.
So c'mon, Susan, join in. I can't wait to hear the SCrawford podcast! What will you play?
|
||||||||
|
Login
|
Podcasting is the Future of Radio
Comments
Re: Podcasting is the Future of Radio
by
Ross
on Thu 30 Dec 2004 06:31 PM PST | Profile | Permanent Link
Radio is the future of podcasting.
Audioblogs are the future of podcasting. Drama is the future of podcasting. Broadcast, on the other hand, doesn't have much of a future beyond what it is being used for today. Podcasting is just the internet forcing commodization - next victim please. Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: |
|||||||


