Which leads me to transparency.
The key here is that the GNSO views time with the Board as "precious." The GNSO isn't alone in that view. The GAC wants time with the Board. The ALAC wants time with the Board. Each of the GNSO constituencies wants separate time with the Board. Time with the Board is precious because it's the only window we have into the Board's thinking. The only time we're really sure that they're listening to us is when they are actually sitting at the table with us. Podcast the Board's monthly teleconferences, open the Board's private mailing lists, put Board and Council interactions onto a Wiki, and the demands on the Board's time actually will diminish.
Board members increasingly bemoan the time commitment required by Board service. And they're right: no Board service, profit or non-profit, should require the sort of time commitment that is required of the ICANN Board. As the demands on the Board have increased over time, they've responded by extending the number of days in each meeting, extending the working hours of each day, and increasing the number of Board meetings. That's one way of solving the problem.The better solution to the problem has been in the bylaws all along: "ICANN and its constituent bodies shall operate to the maximum extent feasible in an open and transparent manner...." I promise you, Board Members, it will change your lives for the better.

