create a reader account | log in
Lextext
Bret Fausett's Internet Printing Press

Bret Fausett's Other Weblog:

Pray For Rain

View Article  How Did I Ever Live Without Broadband?
The SBC DSL line at home has been down for the last week. SBC is blaming it on the rains or something -- I understand that connections are down in spots all over Los Angeles County. This explains why bret.net has been offline (and still is), so if you hit a link that doesn't work, check the URL: the page may have been served from bret.net. Anyway, the repair truck is finally making its way to my house tonight between 4-8 p.m., and I'm keeping my fingers crossed that it will be carrying a solution.

I have podcasts to download!

Update: Mission accomplished!
View Article  Rabotaet, Ne Trogaj
Veni Markovski's Statement to the WSIS Plenary: "Dear Mr. President, Dear Colleagues...."
View Article  ICANN on IDN Homograph Attacks
ICANN Statement on IDN Homograph Attacks and Request for Public Comment: "ICANN calls for views and positions regarding both homograph vulnerability, which is not unique to IDNs, and the proposed countermeasures, which include having browser support for IDNs turned off by default, while at the same time not protecting against older forms of URI and domain name abuse."
View Article  Jerry Brown Has a Weblog
Here's a Weblog to Add to Your Newsreader: "Truth comes in many forms. ...Vitriol can irritate, but it is often the price of freewheeling discussion and the discovery of important stuff."

But Jerry, you need your own domain name.
http://jerrybrown. typepad.com/ jerry/ is sort of cumbersome.
View Article  CENTR on IDN Homograph Attacks
From the CENTR Statement on IDN Homograph Attacks:

[O]n 15 February 2005 the Mozilla Foundation announced it had a plan to disable IDNs by default in future versions of its web browsers. CENTR, a group of many of the world's domain registries - representing over 98% of domain registrations worldwide - believes such strong reactions are heavily detrimental to the effort to introduce non-English languages and scripts to the Internet, and could have lasting repercussions on the ongoing effort to internationalise the DNS. With this in mind, CENTR would like to make the following points....

The CENTR Statement is well worth reading if you've been following this thread.
View Article  GNSO Call For Nominations for Board Seat
The Names Council of the GNSO has issued a call for nominations for Board Seat 14, the seat currently filled by Michael Palage. The nomination period closes on Friday, March 11th. After they are made, nominations will be posted on this page (which is empty as of the date of this post). The vote will conclude on April 1, 2005. The person elected will serve a three-year term on ICANN's Board of Directors.
View Article  I Need A New Registrar
I need a new registrar. Once upon a time I opened an SRSPlus account and have used that for the bulk of my domain name registrations (I only have about 25 or so). My primary reason for using SRSPlus was that the company provided Los Angeles County as the exclusive forum for litigating disputes and made California law the law governing the contract. That fit me perfectly. After the Verisign-Netsol split though, SRSPlus adopted the policies of its parent Network Solutions, complete with Virginia domain name law and forum in the Eastern District of Virginia. So I plan to get the hell out of Herndon and move my domain names back home to California. In an ideal world, I'd like a Los Angeles-based registrar or, absent that, a registrar willing to give me my choice of forum and my choice of law. Any recommendations?
View Article  WGIG Preliminary Report
Just posted (in PDF format): Preliminary Report of the Working Group on Internet Governance Submitted to the Preparatory Committee of the World Summit on the Information Society.
View Article  Now THAT'S an Inspection
Overheard on the Publc Address System this morning at the Bob Hope Burbank Airport: "Mr. _______, please return to the airport inspection station to retrieve your pair of Levi jeans. Repeat. Mr. ________, please return to the airport inspection station to retrieve your pair of Levi jeans."
View Article  Board Meeting Today

From the ICANN Meetings page, here is the agenda for the February 18th Special Meeting of the Board:

  • sTLD Issues - Update and discussion of status on all applications including .CAT and .ASIA
  • Appointment of individuals to the Interim At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) to a fill a North American and a European vacancy
  • Launch of .pro profession specific extension for engineers
  • IPv4 Global Allocation Policy
  • Approval of Payment for .NET Evaluator
  • Other Business

If recent history is any guide, a preliminary report will be available at some remote time in the future, far beyond the time required by ICANN's Bylaws. Official minutes ought to be posted some time in the next year.

View Article  RAA Under Review
Bhavin Turakhia, writing on the Registrar Constituency List: "ICANN is currently reviewing the RAA and intends to make changes and come up with a new RAA by June. This is very important to all of us from the following perspectives...."

This will be an important process to follow. "RAA" stands for "Registrar Accreditation Agreement," which is the primary document that governs a registrar's rights and responsibilities vis-a-vis ICANN.
View Article  Verisign Claims That GNSO Captured by its Competitors
From Verisign's Appellate Brief:

"The Supporting Organizations and Constituency Groups of ICANN that engaged in the restraints of trade alleged in the FAC [First Amended Complaint] were substantially controlled by existing and potential competitors of Verisign and others sharing similar economic interests with Verisign's competitors. ICANN has expressly admitted (as quoted in the FAC) in other proceedings that this bottom-up policy making process is subject to control or 'capture' by small groups of competitive interests. According to ICANN, an important reason that its processes are subject to capture is that competitors may have strong interests directly affected by particular actions of ICANN, while other members of ICANN's Constituency Groups generally are part time volunteers, are not directly affected by such actions, and/or lack the time or resources fully to participate in ICANN's processes, therefore not attending meetings or voting on issues presented to Constituency Groups. The result, according to ICANN, is that a small number of highly motivated competitors may control the actions and decisions of ICANN's Supporting Organizations and this its Board."

The "proof" for these allegations is supposedly Paragraphs 84-87 of Verisign's First Amended Complaint. The problem is that all of the allegations, including those attributed to ICANN itself, reference the pre-Reform ICANN of 1998-2002. The Reform process, in which these statements were made and which precedes the decisions at issue, was designed to correct these perceived deficiencies.
View Article  Litigation Documents Aplenty

The last two blog posts came from this page on the ICANN-Verisign litigation, updated yesterday with many new pleadings. A lot of interesting reading there, including the appellate briefs before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Verisign's antitrust claim (Verisign's Brief / ICANN's Brief) and various other pleadings on the current California state court skirmish. Now I suppose we know what this Board meeting was all about.

Thanks to the reader who wrote with news that the litigation page had been updated!

View Article  Wishful Thinking
From Verisign's Request for Arbitration: "Under the express terms of the .net Registry Agreement, neither the current ICANN selection process nor the selection of a successor registry operator pursuant to that process would be of any force or effect with respect to Verisign." Paragraph 3 of Verisign's January 15, 2005 filing.
View Article  Tentative Ruling on .NET Litigation
From the Los Angeles Superior Court: "ICANN is moving to stay this action pending the results of the .net arbitration proceeding. Since the arbitration provision in the .net Registry Agreement is found by the Court to be invalid, however, the arbitrators' findings and award in the .net Registry Agreement arbitration will have no legal preclusive effect on this present case. The Court denies the motion."
View Article  Now Children, Please Stop This...
According to the LA Times, Steve Jobs sent an e-mail to record executives yesterday with a link to an article about insecurities in Napster that would allow users to convert songs covered by their Napster subscription to permanent files. The Napster CEO responded by e-mailing record executives with links to software designed to defeat Apple's DRM solution. Folks, this is foolishishness. The "my-DRM-is-better-than-your-DRM" game is not good for consumers...and it's not good for technology companies either.

I'd much rather see Apple and Napster compete on price, depth of their respective music catalogues, and new services than on which can best withstand the legal fury of the RIAA.
View Article  "Homographic Spoofing" and IDNs
This is interesting. The Mozilla Foundation announced today that "In the forthcoming Mozilla Firefox 1.0.1 and Mozilla 1.8 Beta releases, IDN support will be disabled." And Ross Rader from Tucows wrote: "Tucows has been selling IDNs since the initial NSI test-bed was announced. It was a bad idea then and I'd be much happier now if we hadn't jumped in as quickly as we did."
Serious stuff. I now want to read more -- a lot more -- about "homographic spoofing." Links welcome. Any solutions?

Add: Paul Hoffman on "IDN Spoofing Solutions with Balance". Paul writes "Given the assumption that billions of people would actually like to have their domain names be in characters that they use every day, there has to be better solutions to the homograph spoofing problem. Fortunately, there are...." More here.

Reading:
View Article  BulkRegister Launches Private Whois Registrations
PR Newswire: "BulkRegister, the world's leading business registrar, today announced the industry's first wholesale Private WHOIS Registration service, which will end unwanted solicitations and guard against identity theft for domain owners...."
View Article  NYTimes on 'Google is a Registrar'
New York Times writes: "Bret Fausett, who publishes Lextext.com, a Web log following the domain name industry, and who first disclosed the news that Google had become a registrar, said Google could improve the quality of search results by getting better access to the list of expiring domain names - a list available only to registrars."

I spoke with Bob Tedeschi at the New York Times about this article a couple of weeks ago when the Google story first started making the rounds. Nice fellow. But I didn't say "a list available only to registrars." In fact, I said the opposite. We actually talked about this in some detail, and I said that registry zone file access -- available to anyone who wants it (I'm a registered user, for example, with Verisign, Afilias and Neustar) -- would be sufficient. I did say that access to the information might be easier and better as a registrar (NYT: "better access") but that I couldn't speak to that since I'm not a registrar. I appreciate that the accurate information is too much detail for a short column, but the shorthand, reader-friendly answer isn't correct. A nit, perhaps, to those who follow this tangentially, but an important correction for regular readers here.
View Article  Notes From Amsterdam
Thomas Roessler: "Some initial notes from the 'Amsterdam Consultation on the ICANN Strategic Plan,' as the meeting has ultimately been called...."