Paul Twomey: "We are firmly committed
to a multi-stakeholder approach....We expect to evolve, we
expect to keep changing. We are concerned about stability [of the
internet] and we think it's best to evolve existing institutions. Our
present corporate structure is a matter of history, not of any
particular design."
I either don't understand or don't agree with that last sentence. ICANN was designed and its design is a result of many discussions and negotiations over a period of years. It was redesigned, with celebrated time and effort, just a couple of years ago. The result may not be pretty and still can be improved, but it didn't line up like this by some historical accident.
|
||||
|
The Design History of ICANN's Structure
Comments
Re: The Design History of ICANN's Structure
by
Ross
on Fri 14 Oct 2005 06:36 AM PDT | Profile | Permanent Link
I think Paul is talking about the corporate structure in the "california corporation" sense - which is largely a matter of history....
Re: The Design History of ICANN's Structure
by
Bret Fausett
on Fri 14 Oct 2005 08:10 AM PDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Okay that makes sense. If he's saying "we're in California because its the location of IANA and Jon Postel," I understand it. And agree with it.
Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: |
||||

