|
||||
|
Friday, December 17
by
Bret Fausett
on Fri 17 Dec 2004 10:18 PM PST
Episode One, in which I take on one of the 107 categories of Grammy nominations and play all of the nominated songs in the category (plus a few others). Yeehaw!
Thursday, December 16
by
Bret Fausett
on Thu 16 Dec 2004 07:40 PM PST
New and improved. Twice the music, half the file size. I'm learning!
by
Bret Fausett
on Thu 16 Dec 2004 04:33 PM PST
E-Commerce Times: ICANN Stands To Reap Windfall from New Domain Fee. "In the short term, the tax could add US$4
million annually to ICANN's coffers, an amount that could skyrocket to
more than $30 million if it is extended to additional domains...."
'Should 75 cents appear too small Be thankful I don't take it all....'
by
Bret Fausett
on Thu 16 Dec 2004 10:11 AM PST
Declan McCullagh: "ICANN Proposes New Net Tax. The international organisation that oversees
domain names has levied a 75-cent-per-domain charge. Why are they doing
it, and can they get away with it?...."
Wednesday, December 15
by
Bret Fausett
on Wed 15 Dec 2004 12:33 PM PST
Another Internet Pro Radio show over at the ol' podcasting station. Nothing ICANN-related, mostly music.
by
Bret Fausett
on Wed 15 Dec 2004 11:48 AM PST
From CNET: "'Mr. Ballmer, now we still have to type in 'weather.com.cn' to check
the weather. Most Chinese people can't do that. They just want to type
in 'tian qi' (Chinese for weather),' he said. Short of a more concrete
answer, Ballmer acknowledged that Microsoft needs to work better with
the various domain name authorities to resolve this problem."
Tuesday, December 14
by
Bret Fausett
on Tue 14 Dec 2004 03:09 PM PST
An Internet Pro Radio show for Tuesday, December 14th. No discussion of ICANN, so ICANN Blog followers can feel free to skip....unless they like music for grownups.
Monday, December 13
by
Bret Fausett
on Mon 13 Dec 2004 03:12 PM PST
ICANN Press Release: "ICANN is pleased to announce that the independent evaluation process, which began earlier this year has resulted in two further sponsored Top Level Domain (sTLD) applications moving to the next stage. As the process for selecting new sponsored Top Level Domain (sTLDs) continues from a pool of ten applications, ICANN has entered into commercial and technical negotiations with two additional candidate registries, .JOBS and .MOBI. No limit was set on the number of sTLDs, and this now adds to the two candidate registries (.POST and .TRAVEL) announced in October."
Thursday, December 9
by
Bret Fausett
on Thu 09 Dec 2004 11:09 AM PST
CBS Marketwatch: "Take a look at the undiscovered Tucows."
P.S. TCOW is not "unloved" at my house. We've continued to buy it over the last year. Tuesday, December 7
by
Bret Fausett
on Tue 07 Dec 2004 09:46 PM PST
Lenovo? I don't get this.
by
Bret Fausett
on Tue 07 Dec 2004 10:41 AM PST
I suppose you could say that Internet governance jumped the shark the same day that someone put the two words "Internet" and "governance" together for the first time. Still, if you ever gave the concept of governing the Internet any credence, surely this subway map of Internet governance, seemingly torn from the pages of The Onion, will give you pause. Hmmm, let's see, if I get on at Indigenous People, change to the Green Line at Copyright Station, I can be at DNS Policy by lunch time!
by
Bret Fausett
on Tue 07 Dec 2004 10:24 AM PST
ComputerWeekly.com: "The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann) is to choose a new registrar for the .net domain next spring...."
Monday, December 6
by
Bret Fausett
on Mon 06 Dec 2004 03:34 PM PST
AllAfrica.com: "ICANN Rules Out ITU Merger."
Sunday, December 5
by
Bret Fausett
on Sun 05 Dec 2004 11:42 AM PST
by
Bret Fausett
on Sun 05 Dec 2004 11:00 AM PST
by
Bret Fausett
on Sun 05 Dec 2004 10:35 AM PST
Elliot Noss has an excellent take on the anonymously penned 'Reformation' article posted on Susan Crawford's site. The point that registries and registrars operate from different places in the Internet's infrastructure is a good one. Sitefinder illustrates the problem. You can make a good faith argument -- tenable if not necessarily persuasive -- that Sitefinder provides an enhanced user experience for http queries by presenting users with an extra set of resources to help them find what they want when their original query fails. I get that. What you can't defend, however, is the abrupt manner in which Sitefinder was launched. This is precisely because Sitefinder wasn't launched "from the edge." It was launched from a core infrastructure service and others were expecting the operation of that core service to remain consistent or, as they say, "stable." (Related note from me to ICANN here.) An unannounced new service launch from a registrar or an ISP wouldn't have had the same impact, namely because disgruntled users could have moved to other providers. That's the fundamental difference between registries and registrars. Saturday, December 4
by
Bret Fausett
on Sat 04 Dec 2004 12:16 AM PST
File deleted.
|
||||

